|
|
round 3
Jan 12, 2011 23:01:55 GMT -5
Post by Rupert Boneham on Jan 12, 2011 23:01:55 GMT -5
So it appears we're all going to vote out Amber. Lets see what happens. It should be an easy vote, but you never know!
|
|
|
|
round 3
Jan 12, 2011 23:06:37 GMT -5
Post by itsfabiodude on Jan 12, 2011 23:06:37 GMT -5
Hey Rupert!
1. What went down to make the vote Amber? It seemed like Sydney was the target last time
|
|
|
|
round 3
Jan 13, 2011 0:19:00 GMT -5
Post by Rupert Boneham on Jan 13, 2011 0:19:00 GMT -5
I believe this time people want to go with a unanimous vote and take out the weakest link. We can't afford to lose good players when we lost pretty badly. I'm hoping this is a unanimous vote and no surprise blindside votes
|
|
